HP HSTNN-OB77 Battery | http://www.labatterie.fr

For reference, although there’s no hard limit to the maximum resolution of a VGA connection (shown above), we’ve found that laptop graphics cards often top out around 2,048 x 1,536, and it’s worth knowing that images can look softer and less sharp via a VGA cable as it’s an analogue rather than a digital connection. A DVI connection is a better bet, partly as it’s a digital connection, but even here you still have to be careful: if you want to use resolutions above 1,920 x 1,200, you’ll need both a dual-link DVI cable and a dual-link compatible connector on your laptop. Take a look at the image below to see the difference between a dual-link (left) and a single-link cable (right).

Similarly, although the HDMI 1.3 standard added support for monitors and displays which stretch beyond the popular Full HD resolution (1,920 x 1,080 pixels), and HDMI 1.4 and HDMI 2.0 now support up to 4K resolutions, both your laptop and monitor will need to support the standard for the connection to work. If you have a laptop with an HDMI 1.2 or earlier port, then you won’t be able to push the secondary monitor resolution higher than 1,920 x 1,200. Displayport is the most flexible connection of the bunch. Even the older DisplayPort 1.1 standard supports up to 4K resolutions at 30hz (this limits the onscreen framerate to a jerky 30fps so, while movies look fine, it isn’t suitable for 4K gaming); DisplayPort 1.2 adds support for 4K resolutions at a smooth 60hz; and the most recent standard, DisplayPort 1.3, adds support for 8K resolutions (7,680 x 4,320 pixel). With some laptops, and graphics cards, different outputs will support different resolutions and refresh rates, so it’s worth checking which is the most capable before buying any cables or adapters – if you don’t, you may end up not getting the highest resolutions and refresh rates out of your monitor or TV.

If you’ve got a recent Apple laptop or desktop with a Thunderbolt connection, then bear in mind that you can use a mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable (or a DisplayPort adapter) to connect to any compatible monitor – the monitor doesn’t need to have a Thunderbolt input. You can pick up a mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable for a couple of quid on Amazon.Everyone has it. Food that languishes at the back of the cupboard for years because you can’t be bothered to throw it out. A jar of some gooseberry jam from 2008; the redcurrant jelly you bought for Christmas dinner six years ago; or even a can of beans from 2010. Office for Mac had been feeling past its sell-by date, too: last updated in 2011, it’s been steadily going mouldy ever since.

Until now, that is. Office for Mac 2016 is finally available to the public, arriving a full three years after the last update on the PC, and five years after the last Mac-based release.Even then, only subscribers to Office 365 can get access to this latest version. If you prefer a perpetual licence to a yearly or monthly charge, you’re going to have to wait until September before you can buy the suite outright. Microsoft hasn’t revealed how much this will cost either.It’s an embarrassing state of affairs, to say the least, and for many the update will arrive too late. By now, many Mac devotees – at least those with a choice in the matter – will have abandoned Microsoft’s ageing office suite in favour of modern, cheaper alternatives. Now iWork is free and Google Docs so much more powerful than it used to be, there are plenty of capable alternatives.

Essentially, Office 2016 brings the Mac version up to the same level as the Windows release, both in terms of the user interface and features. So, you’re getting a redesigned ribbon toolbar that looks far cleaner and which makes it a little easier to find what you’re looking for.I’ve never been a big fan of the ribbon in the Windows version. You still have to do far too much hunting around for features you know exist but can’t locate – and on the Mac, there’s still the issue that it looks a little out of place. But I’m certain that I’ll get used to it over time; there’s absolutely no doubt that it’s a huge improvement on the old version.Critically, Microsoft’s office suite no longer looks like it fell out of the 1980s, with full support for Retina screens and a look that’s consistent across all the key applications. With Office 2016, OS X users finally have a modern office suite that looks the part.

More specifically, the apps have a brighter look overall than before. If you choose the “colorful” option during setup, the area above the ribbon toolbar in each app will match each application’s signature colour: green for Excel, dark blue for Word, red for PowerPoint, light blue for Outlook and purple for OneNote.But despite that, there’s a pleasing sense of minimalism at work here. The ribbon, as well as being reorganised, takes up less space than before, and the menus have a flatter, more modern appearance. And now that the icons are less packed together and have been redesigned, everything looks less cluttered than before.Office 2016 for Mac is about more than just looks, however. There’s improved support for multitouch touchpad gestures, for instance: you can now pinch to zoom in to documents, presentations and spreadsheets – to focus in on a detail or to get an overview – and scrolling and zooming animations are smoother as well.

On that front, at least, Office for 2016 is superior to the Windows version. In fact, Windows as a whole has never quite got to grips with seamless, responsive touchpad gestures in the way that OS X has.And there are some other, small differences between Office on the Mac that contribute to a superior overall experience to the Windows version. The main one is that the confusingly muddled File menu, dubbed Backstage by Microsoft – in which the entire application window is hijacked by the Save, Open, Print preview and Settings menus – is not in evidence here.For me, that’s a good thing. Backstage has always felt jarring, in the way it rides roughshod over OS paradigms established following years of careful development. Why should Office have a completely different way of opening and saving files to every other application on the platform? It may be the future, but it isn’t one that I’m particularly fond of.

Here, thankfully, files are opened and saved using a much simpler dialog box. In my opinion it feels much less befuddling, and it manages to integrate Microsoft’s cloud storage system, OneDrive, at least as well as Backstage does. It could do with a search box, though – and, disappointingly, there’s no third-party cloud integration as yet. So no Dropbox or Google Drive.The big question is, for those who have moved away to other offerings, is there enough in the latest version to justify subscribing? The answer is that it depends on your outlook (if you’ll pardon the pun). There’s no doubt that Office 2016 for Mac is a huge improvement. It looks more attractive, it’s easier to use than before and has more features than ever before.But if you’re not interested in the latest UI gewgaws and a handful of features that may or may not be of use, then you’re better off sticking to what you have. Google Docs most certainly does the collaboration bit better, while iWork covers most basic needs perfectly adequately.

According to TV pundits, there are many factors that go into winning a football match: flair, guts, tactics, set-pieces, luck. There’s another one that probably isn’t on Robbie Savage’s list of clichés, but most definitely should be: data.In today’s football industry, decisions about which player to spend £35 million on aren’t based purely on the manager’s gut reaction or the notes jotted down in the chief scout’s little black book – they’re made after months of detailed analysis tracking thousands of players from across the world. Birmingham-based Scout7 has one of the biggest scouting databases in the business, allowing top clubs such as Chelsea, Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool to marry their own, highly confidential scouting data with the video analysis and data captured by the company.Combining all this information and serving it up to clubs around the world, 24/7, requires powerful, custom-built data centres, tight data security and impeccable UI design. We caught up with Scout7’s operations director, Bradford Griffiths, to find out how they manage it.

Scout7 was one of the pioneers of using computer software to identify transfer targets, something that was largely confined to players of football sim Championship Manager when the company was founded in 2001. It was also one of the earliest proponents of cloud computing.Scout7 has a two-tier approach to scouting: it provides its own database of player data and also allows partner clubs to create a scouting database of their own. In the first instance, clubs can search the company’s database of 135,000 players worldwide to create a list of potential targets. This details the player’s full history: appearances, goals, positions, injury history, transfer fees and more. Clubs often have specific requirements – they might, for instance, want a right-back, no older than 26, with an EU passport, who’s played at least 75% of the games for his club over the past three seasons – and Scout7 allows clubs to filter against such detailed criteria.

When the company first started offering this database to clubs in 2001 it took a gamble, because not only was it asking clubs to adopt entirely new methods of scouting, it was asking them to access this data over the internet.“This was a time when the internet was a fledgling as a business tool,” says Griffiths, “but the decision was made to start collecting global football data and presenting it through an online application. It was ambitious to go for Software as a Service back in 2001, because these scouts weren’t even working at the stadium. They were working the training ground, and training grounds weren’t connected to the internet. By luck or judgement, it was absolutely the right decision.”http://www.dearbattery.co.uk/sony.html

Oldal ajánlása emailben

Kommentek